Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[Raider21]

Quote: Thank you! So you actually are saying that anything could have been on the floatsom of any size that sank in the area. I'll wait and see what the numerous objects are they have located. JMO
___________________________________

Obviously that has to be the case in this instance or there wouldn't have been a weighty object as a iron cannon in the area. But, clearly, the other 31 cannons, piles of silver and gold bars, chests of coins and (if a main wreck site) tons and tons of ballast aren't there. Perhaps for you, yes but for me with some actual field experience, the 1,000 plus targets are not impressive if even accurate. Firstly, I thought the Tinkerbell see all, know all (even without metal detection ability) was supposed to be able to distinctly define target depth, density, dimensional size, and even angle degree of object? That doesn't seem to be the case with these assigned 1,000 plus targets or locations. Here once again, I'd bet the 'crow sandwich' that most of those are natural geological point-source parabolas. By the way, who is the on-board systems operator, meaning what credentials in marine geology or geophysics? Thats the norm. on some of the surveys I've been on. Surely it isn't Kyle Kennedy, the penny stock man, sitting there monitoring the screen. Continuous entertainment.