Nate's Food Company (NHMD)

[SoupFor1]

The burden of proof is on the one making the claim. Where is the proof that Wade is pulling the strings?

Arguing that there is no evidence to the contrary is a logical fallacy that has been identified by philosophers for centuries. It is called the Argument from Ignorance, check it out here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

Now that that is out of the way, can we see some proof that Wade is still involved instead of just these totally unsupported claims and faulty attempts at logic?