I’d first start by saying can you tell the difference between a primate and a human? If the answer is yes, I have a followup question. OK you probably know, a human is a primate but not all primates are humans. One quickly sees this testing was not done on humans.
The followup question would be can you tell the difference between a primate and a primate cell?
The next question would be do you know the difference between in vitro and in vivo?
If you know these things and have just a little knowledge of science and clinical studies, you’d know there is massive failure rate taking in vitro results in animal cells and projecting it all the way to working on entire humans. It is a real big leap for most things like drug study on a virus, on cancer, etc...
The guy writing this clearly had an agenda or has no clue what he is talking about in regards to the medical study findings and that it would have any effect on humans without much further study based solely on some beneficial results of chloroquine on some primate cells in a petri dish.
The results COULD lead to good outcomes but it looks like the further this got studied, the less promise it showed. That would help demonstrate why Dr Fauci was probably Cautious on hydroxychloroquine knowing he knew the 2005 stuff didn't work out on humans.
I don't mind stealing bread from the mouths of decadence... But I can't feed on the powerless when my cup's already overfilled.
-Temple of the Dog