SEC suspends for questions or reasons?
The SEC's own action states that their motivation in the suspension was "questions," which, unless you are unfamiliar with grammar and syntax, suggests "answers" are not yet given. Red and blues behind you . . . you stop . . . cop says, "I have questions" . . . you get out - get handcuffed - taken to jail -booked in jail for 10 days . . . without ever a chance to answer the questions . . . and then released, not to go home, but to go to Reform School, and the public entity that arrested you has no accountability . . . sound like America in 2020? The SEC did not say (nor do they ever say) "we discovered that . . .," which makes the entire process look very shady for any stock ever suspended. Now, it could be that "questions concerning" ends up being a language game where the words actually mean (to the SEC) something like: "we have discovered all we need to discover in order to suspend, but none of you will ever know if or what we discovered." In that case, all bets are off and the motivation lies shrouded in mystery.
Those of you who claim there has already been an investigation and the SEC has final results . . . where's the proof? Please don't embarrass yourself by saying "the suspension."
It is possible that those who bought based on the "quick test helps America get back to work - and we will have more virus attacks in the future so we will need these tests" idea were scammed. But I will need much more evidence than is currently being promulgated by the shorts/bears on this board and others elsewhere before I concede that. It remains true for me that even if this stock goes to grey market, that in itself is not evidence that it is a scam.
