InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 36
Posts 1166
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/07/2013

Re: Jack_of_All_Trades post# 70572

Tuesday, 04/14/2020 11:03:41 AM

Tuesday, April 14, 2020 11:03:41 AM

Post# of 97081
There have been posts claiming there is no "proof" or the science is questionable. I'm not a scientist, but it is worthy to note for others on the board that in the supplemental disclosure document filed on March 30th and quoted in my longer post this portion:

In all three cases the researchers designed and built a bench level chemistry methodology and their version of an identification device, and then performed tests on live patients. In all cases the number of patients (subjects) tested was statistically significant. The importance of these publications indicated that a testing device and chemistry method, using impedance (better described as an energy pulse with traits somewhat similar to an electric current and a radio wave pulse), could be created in short order to measure the presence or absence of such a virus (of interest) such as influenza and H1N1 influenza, and of course SARS and Covid-19.



So in their filed documents they are stating that the science their test kits are based on has been tested on live patients and with a statistically significant number, which is why they are putting all their resources and efforts into these new rapid test kits, confident that they will work.

I cannot verify or deny such claims, I'm just passing on what they have filed with the government recently and why they have given the outlook they have given.

Everyone read, weigh, and wager accordingly IMHO.

Happy to contribute to the discussion.