InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 644
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/18/2002

Re: alan81 post# 35824

Tuesday, 12/12/2006 3:35:11 PM

Tuesday, December 12, 2006 3:35:11 PM

Post# of 151812
INTC 45nm data/comparison
I don't think INTC has published any 45nm data, but has a summary on their web site here:
http://www.intel.com/technology/silicon/new_45nm_silicon.htm
If we combine this data with what we know of AMD/IBM 45nm we get the following table:
INTC PMOS 65nm/45nm 710/852AMD PMOS 65nm/45nm 735/840INTC NMOS 65nm/45nm 1210/1452AMD NMOS 65nm/45nm 1260/124045nm SRAM cell size: INTC= .346, IBM/AMD=.37

Note that the 65nm INTC numbers I have are from the original 2004 IEDM paper. I heard INTC updated these numbers by a few percent at the 2005 IEDM, but that should be a small enough error as to be ignored for now...


I was thinking more process data not performance data (although that is good) - I was thinking more about how they're actually fabricating the chip.

AMD/IBM is crowing about immersion lithography, ultra low-k, etc. What does Intel have on tap for 45nm?

Mike

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin

http://fingolfen.blogspot.com

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INTC News