Reiterating "COULD THEORETICALLY be an aspect of the suspension..", I never said it was the sole reason. And if you read the SEC guidelines from the link MJ provides it states Netflix was an example of such SM actions giving rise to the regulation being clarified... Also do you remember Tesla getting halted for the tweets musk put out not too long ago? Just cause you don't notice or follow every stock on the stock market to determine if they were or were not ever halted for such reasons doesn't mean that doesn't happen...
Thank you for the quick response, going back to one of my other points that you didn't acknowledge though...
"MJ did research to find the SEC guidelines pertaining to that case and it does make sense that the company would be posting the news that they are using SM to issue news which seems like they are disclosing that fact to investors in turn meeting the SEC guidelines for such news releases AND ever since then the company has been very active on their twitter pages after several days of silence... if it’s nothing to do with suspension are you thinking it’s just a weird strange coincidence??
"Occam's razor says that when presented with competing hypotheses that make the same predictions, one should select the solution with the fewest assumptions, and it is not meant to be a way of choosing between hypotheses that make different predictions... hereas simpler models may capture the underlying structure better and may thus have better predictive performance. It is, however, often difficult to deduce which part of the data is noise (Wikipedia explanation of Occam's Razor)." Right now it seems as the point MJ made would be a hypotheses that makes different predictions than your own indication Occam's razor is not meant to be used, as well as, it changes the hypothesis fitting a now simpler model thus (considering you wanting to employ Occam's Razor) maybe the social media having not been disclosed to investors for PR source could have better predictive model...
Other differing predictions can stem from examining each PR and update they put out to determine a hypothesis based on what direct thing they mentioned about coronavirus operations specifically started this..
Have you looked into and researched all the updates they put out while attempting to be open to shareholders and investors about company operations? Or have you pulled up all the media sources and analyzed each one based off what they mentioned to determine where these "claims" were made yet? To answer all of these questions, a lot of assumptions about what thing could have been the direct statment that they mentioned in regards to covid that caused the problem... Occam's Razor sometimes paraphrased by a statement like "the simplest solution is most likely the right one". The SM is a simple one is it not?
(NOTE: I reiterate for the second time, I don't believe that it is in fact the sole reason this is just to prove the point that the theory for your defense is invalid in this circumstance)
Remember from the filing it states:
Those concerns relate to statements NBDR made in: (1) social media posts since at least March 11, 2020; (2) press releases since at
least March 16, 2020; (3) NBDR’s website since at least March 24, 2020; and (4) submissions to
OTC Markets Group, Inc. since at least March 25, 2020.
Yes, the concerns were specifically directed toward business activities related to the COVID-19 pandemic; however, they listed multiple media platforms the company used to issue the information and directly states social media as part of it.
I'm now also interested to now see what exact statements from all the company updates put out from the dates and sources above you think "is what they claimed that got them axed" leading to be the only reasons for this suspension?? That's a hard question to answer (and I don't really expect you to have exact phrases to quote but if you do find some please share) which is why the SEC is the one further exploring NBDR "due to questions and concerns regarding the adequacy and accuracy of publicly available information"... There were questions and concerns they had regarding the matter so they wanted to make sure these activities were adequate and accurate. But to think the suspension solely stems from the general stance that it only pertains to claims is interesting because from the filing again "including, since at least March 11, 2020, among other things, statements about NBDR’s products and business activities.."
