InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 87
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 08/08/2017

Re: Renee post# 8640

Tuesday, 04/07/2020 6:43:22 PM

Tuesday, April 07, 2020 6:43:22 PM

Post# of 9773
I understand that and they for the further information, however, please read the specifics AFTER the phrase “because of questions regarding the accuracy and adequacy of information...”

“... because of questions regarding the accuracy and adequacy of information in the marketplace since at least February 27, 2020. Those questions relate to statements PXYN made about having, and being able to obtain, large quantities of N95 masks used to protect wearers from COVID-19 in press releases issued by the Company on February 27, 2020 and March 4, 2020.”

“... because of concerns about the adequacy and reliability of publicly available information concerning ETBI, including since at least January 30, 2020, among other things, statements about the company’s purported international marketing rights to an approved coronavirus treatment to potentially combat the Wuhan Coronavirus and disclosures by the Company in their September 30, 2019 Quarterly Report regarding their issued and outstanding shares.”

“...because of (i) concerns regarding the accuracy and adequacy of information in the marketplace since at least January 22, 2020, that appears to be disseminated by third party promotors that are, purportedly, not affiliated with AEMD about, among other things, the viability of the company’s product to treat the coronavirus and (ii) questions regarding recent and unusual market activity since at least January 22, 2020.”

... each is different right? Each one indicates the specifics the SEC is looking into... AND the basis of thousands of other suspension being a certain way carries little back cause during those time they were not focusing on companies related to the COVID-19 pandemic... yes there were other situations where they explorer ie h1n1, etc etc... but those in this post and my original post of which we are focusing on are specially for covid related activities thus this would be a better starting point for comparisons of suspensions since the world has never seen a worldly pandemic such as this at any recent times in history... plus rules and regulations for the SEC’s thousands of others have been ever evolving and changing so the specific outcomes and regulation instigation topics for all the other previous suspensions in history are very hard to compare to a singular pandemic event such like the one we are in... hence why I only only posted THE SEC SUSPENSIONS IN RELATION TO COVID so other users can more accurately compare make make judgements of what may happen in current events instead of harping on all the past suspensions that don’t reflect this specific topic of issue...