InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 1161
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/04/2004

Re: rawman post# 65199

Sunday, 03/29/2020 9:59:53 PM

Sunday, March 29, 2020 9:59:53 PM

Post# of 97078
It would be probably less than 150mln as many people stopped working. But let say the number is still 150mln. How many trillions were assigned and will be in the future to fight the whole coronavirus situation? Just recently it was over $2 trillion. Does spending 10% of that to test and at the same time to protect all still working force seems like a big expense? These people are at the highest risk of spreading and catching the virus.