Its tricky when I think about it.
I think there are a handful of bad characters who perpetrated a movement with some knowledge of where it would lead. A 600% increase in share price AFTER the 6th and 10th Monitors reports is unreal.
I think there are some folks who didn't give it a lot of thought but just saw some materials and got sucked in. They are ones who got the short end here.
And I think there are some in the middle, who thought about it and made a decision, but their problem is they refused to rethink that decision when overwhelming evidence began pouring in against it. Those are the folks I've been trying to figure out. Its like their identity is tied up with their ability to select, or not, a winner disguised amongst all the "hints" and "clues".
I suspect the charter revocation will change nothing amongst those last 2 groups. The hopeful will still hope, and those in denial will continue to deny because of what it would mean to admit a poor decision.
I would be surprised, however, if there was any meaningful pursuit of this involving the paying of additional money to lawyers.
