InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 92
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/06/2006

Re: chevy56 post# 711

Sunday, 12/10/2006 3:33:37 PM

Sunday, December 10, 2006 3:33:37 PM

Post# of 1965
For well over a year, I had a sneaky suspicion that Centurion didn't do their due diligence in the purchase of some of their mines, and had gotten 3rd or 4th [or worse] rate mines, where the overhead expense was so great that they weren't too thrilled about filing a yearly report, which would show that maybe they are spending $500- $600 or more per ounce to produce gold. So this is how they cut overhead? Will wait & see what their sterling board has to say about this. The board on paper sounds pretty good.

Remember well over a year ago,[I can't find those old PR's] they thought they had a buyer for their mines, from a company in Ireland, Minmet PLC, I believe? And then some Co. in Newfoundland, I believe, was going to buy into one their mines. Both obviously backed out. Their gold holdings are probably a long term bust. It's the possibility of oil that is giving Centurion a chance at all. I hope they make it there, in Alaska, that's why I have still held on to this stock. But this report is a bloody left hook, if it is true.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.