If Rhonda cleaned up ARTR via Custodianship and the Nevada Court, wouldn't that mean that ARTR is now a "clean shell" and is ready for a Reverse Merger. I find the excuse that Rhonda quit ARTR because of "third party interference" is far fetched. I have looked at postings for other stocks and they all have posts that promote and posts that bad mouth. ARTR wasn't the only stock that experienced this. I can only imagine that Rhonda had "third party interference" with all of her Custodianship plays. Did she give up on all of the other stocks that she was involved with? If not, what made ARTR so special? Did she really throw in the towel or is she still in the game?
Presently, (because of the downturn in the markets) there is likely a very limited number of companies that want to get involved in the OTC market by way of a RM but if and when the market improves, things could change. A company with a limited amount of money can participate in the market, very cheaply, by backing into a company via a Reverse Merger and if ARTR has been cleaned up through the Custodianship process, wouldn't it be a prime target? It is my opinion that it is possible that the story that Rhonda washed her hands of ARTR may have been fabricated. If Rhonda had gone through all of the time, trouble and expense to clean up ARTR, does it make sense that she just gave up on it? It doesn't make sense to me and I'm sure that it wouldn't make sense to Rhonda.
My original question in my previous post was " why were 13 million shares traded on Friday"? I can only assume that if Rhonda gave up on ARTR, along with everyone else, why was someone willing to buy 13 million shares?
