Most certainly you don't have to tell me anything. But the idea you have declined to share a real proposed story for what could have went down consistent with your belief of share safety is not correct, as you clearly, repeatedly, argued a narrative of LCY Affirming The Visolis Transaction by extending sums beyond the Upfront Purchase Price. Now that that has confirmed to not have happened.
But my other question - do you think the Monitor does not have an obligation to present a clear picture or do you think they do and they just didn't do that here?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.