Monday, March 09, 2020 6:36:51 PM
1.On September 6, 2008, with the consent of both Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's (the Enterprises) board of directors, FHFA used its authorities to place each Enterprise into conservatorship.
2. FHFA established two conservatorships in response to a substantial deterioration in the housing markets that suggested it severely damaged each Enterprise's financial condition and left both of them unable to fulfill their missions without government intervention.
3. This was misleading to the public and the risk was merely a temporary housing value issue much like a dip in the stock market."
Are NOT these false narratives of FHFA?
Did BOD voluntarily consent for conservatorship?
What is the need for using such narratives?
Shareholders should just focus on unlawful FHFA decisions and Hank/Obama UST decisions.
FEATURED Fifty 1 Labs, Inc. Announces Major Strategic Advancements and Shareholder Updates • Jun 14, 2024 2:07 AM
ECGI Holdings Announces LOI to Acquire Pacific Saddlery to Capitalize on $12.72 Billion Market Potential • ECGI • Jun 13, 2024 9:50 AM
Snakes & Lattes Opens Pop-Up Location at The Wellington Market in Toronto: A New Destination for Fun and Games - Thanks 'The Well', PepsiCo, Indie Pale House & All Sponsors & Partners for Their Commitment & Assistance Throughout The Process • FUNN • Jun 13, 2024 8:18 AM
HealthLynked Introduces Innovative Online Medical Record Request Form Using DocuSign • HLYK • Jun 12, 2024 8:00 AM
Ubiquitech Software Corp (OTC:UBQU) Posts $624,585 Quarterly Revenue - Largest Quarter Since 2018 • UBQU • Jun 11, 2024 10:13 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Files for OTCQB Uplisting, Provides Financial Update • ELEM • Jun 11, 2024 9:25 AM