I am asking why would anyone continue to perpetrate the illogical notion that creditors did not complain because they had knowledge of a payout, when that would require belief that they could have such knowledge, and public investors would not be afforded such knowledge, all the way until the cessation of trading for the security?
Simple question. 9th attempt to get an answer.
Possible ideas for an answer:
A) there are no rules for dissemination of information in public securities. Anything goes. B) you believe the rules were broken and fraud was committed but that’s not your problem C) you don’t know but you don’t want to contemplate this as it eliminates any hope of a payout
You’ve generally been going with C. Is that your final answer?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.