It has not been answered, as that would eliminate gibberish like this:
First off I never said that they never said that. WHAT I SAID was that they didn’t complain about $4.3 being everything . Thanks to that link we now know they also DID complain As UNNECESSARY to keep the CCAA going . They most likely felt that way due to the ensuing Aspect (that of course didn’t need to be discussed lol) . ENSUING means AFTER or AS A RESULT OF
Once again, I am asking why would anyone continue to perpetrate the illogical notion that creditors did not complain because they had knowledge of a payout, when that would require belief that they could have such knowledge, and public investors would not be afforded such knowledge, all the way until the cessation of trading for the security?
