InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 3027
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/25/2020

Re: A deleted message

Saturday, 03/07/2020 7:55:46 AM

Saturday, March 07, 2020 7:55:46 AM

Post# of 797120
The 5th amendment to the PA was meant to pave the way for the judges to state that the FHFA is preparing the termination of the Conservatorship, which is a key factor to evade a Takings claim for the Warrant and the NWS, since it requires to be "permanent". They don't know that a temporary takings can be deemed permanent if the Government's actions have been done through legislation after the declaration of emergency (like in a case of temporary flooding prompted by the Govt), which is what is required for the UST to use its temporary authority to purchase FnF's obligations in HERA.
The indefinite conservatorship can be used to claim "permanent".
You should have known that their weighted average Current LTV ratio stands at 57% and the collateral covers the loans. That's why they have pointed out that the impact of the CECL standard will be very tiny.
The bailout is never a concern because is something embedded in the Charter, so it's not a stigma.
You don't realize that FnF are owed $156 billion ($110 billion in SPS overpayments, MHA program, corporate tax on the settlements, TCCA fees, etc)
I follow the Court news to attack the plaintiffs, defendants and judges. My bet is that Fanniegate will be solved unilaterally by the Govt and according to law, not in a negotiation with the plaintiffs that want to get what they aren't entitled to and cover up key provisions in the law.
My twitter account is @carlosvignote.