I was asking for your opinion of what the details were.
There was a clear theory, I thought, about LCY being the buyer as a lot of the legalese you mentioned - "affirming", "The Visolis", "Upfront Payment" seemed constructed to paint that picture. That Visolis made a public deal and LCY was waiting to announce their "portion". That is until LCY tacitly stated they didn't do that.
So it seems it comes down to the belief that 4.3M wasn't enough, and is as simple as that. Its not enough and so someone else must have done something- theres just no evidence of that yet.
One question that begs: in your mind, did the stated deal and your "theorized" deal happen at the same time, or is the new deal not yet done? I assume it would have had to have already happened, as it would explain why someone would be willing to accept the stated deal that you say is clearly too low. Doesn't that mean it would have had to be offered to shareholders by now for approval?
