BioAmber Inc fka BIOAQ

[Real McCoy]

Yes, I know that you will use the impracticality of getting a tacit rejection from 6 billion odd people in the world, that none of them have or have any intention of entering into a “second transaction” as a “stay of execution” here despite no mention a year and a half later of a second transaction anywhere.

What I’m asking is the reporter, is it not clear that his POV is that of a single, disappointing transaction? You can always maintain your important stay by saying the reporter is not correct and/or doesn’t have knowledge yet of the unannounced “second transaction”.