I would comment if I knew exactly what relevant comments you are challenging me to comment on. By that, I mean that have even a remote connection to CSHD.
In fact, I am really curious what, besides a refreshing aire of linguistic competence, you bring to this little party.
It is obvious you bring a lot of animosity toward me yet you don't explain the genesis of this. Care to share exactly what that is about? Something tells me you had this going before CSHD.
As to you comments, I do like being right but, as I already stated, that part of the equation came when the SEC filed suit. When you consider the amount of abuse suffered at the hands of many here, including you, it seems as if I am entitled to a lot more than I am claiming in the way of "I told you so". Seems to me you are more of a poor loser than I am a poor winner. In fact, I am being downright gracious in trying to help here.
Your impression of my actions here demonstrates that despite your competence in the English language, your ability to percieve things accurately is still in its infancy.. or perhaps you have an agenda that is not being disclosed (see my third paragraph). As far as how I teach my children, I suggest that is none of your business yet making it even more personal once again demonstrates something quite inappropriate for a simple discussion about stocks. In fact this isn't about CSHD at all is it?
Why not tell us all what your problem is.. or is that something you will be avoiding?
