An informed opinion would that is supported by facts. For example, my informed opinion that Bioamber is bankrupt, liquidated, delisted and will never trade again is supported, among many other things, by the FACT that neither Visolis, LCY or KKR purchased the equity of the company in any transaction beyond the one stated in plain English by the court and Monitor. That was made a fact by the recent LCY letter. As I'm sure you will state, the Fact that neither Visolis, LCY or KKR so invested in Bioamber does not make the death of Bomber a fact in and of itself. It is a supporting fact. What are the facts that support the continuation of Bioamber? I would argue only your opinion that 4.3M wasn't enough.