Global Digital Solutions Inc (GDSI)

[Coreton]

only one part of this is even half right, it’s true that if the court does not award Incidental Damages in conjunction with the Specific Performance then GDSI is entitled to take Actual Damages in the alternative. Which would mean a financial award and not the binding of the parties to the SPA.

So the only part that’s partially correct is that GDSI may not own Rontan in the end.

That’s entirely dependent on the ruling as it pertains to Incidental Damages.

There is no part of your information (stickie) that links back to the actual wording in Brazilian law or civil code. You have links to Ambulance chaser Lawyers that post their interpretations of what they think the law says.

See my stickie for the actual wording of Brazilian Civil Code adopted 2015, enacted 2016. These are the words the Judges use not the nonsense posted online by some lawyers.