InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,399.22
(
-0.51%
)
US TECH 100
18,330.80
(
0.00%
)
Dow Jones
39,935.07
(
0.20%
)
Brent Oil
81.46
(
-0.10%
)
Bitcoin
66,988.31
(
1.82%
)
Post# of 79921
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

MrPastorious

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 394
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/15/2006

MrPastorious

Re: gnulnx post# 30026

Friday, 12/08/2006 11:09:25 AM

Friday, December 08, 2006 11:09:25 AM

Post# of 79921
i think we can safely say that the company presumed that they were buying stock below what they considered to be fair value when they announced the share buy back.
And, yes that was for the 2004 year. But my point was that they had already started using non GAAP measurements at that time, and were alot less cagey about using non -GAAP, as evidenced by the quote I pasted.
Just call me the antiPaul.
Trust me, that was no vacation... and thanks
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up