InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 347
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/29/2016

Re: RandyKCMO post# 480

Monday, 02/17/2020 2:57:47 PM

Monday, February 17, 2020 2:57:47 PM

Post# of 927
Randy,

I wouldn't expect much of anything from a company that has now changed their entire business plan 3 times in almost as many years. To go from building engines to selling compost to now cures for cancer, you can't take them seriously as a long term investment.

Management doesn't hold any significant stock positions compared to the handsome salaries they have paid themselves since inception. This is by design.

When you consider the huge wave of debt that is coming due, which will be paid out in shares, then a reverse split followed by an increase in authorized shares makes perfect sense.

First the will do a reverse split to increase the share price, then will come an increase in authorized shares to cover the debt and the drastic price drop which will be a result of the sell off.

Keep in mind that no one is working for this company full time! Even for the top 2, this company represents nothing more than a side gig to their day jobs. Albeit at several hundred thousand dollars a year each, its a very lucrative side gig.

If the management truly believed in Q2P and were indeed working for the benefit of the shareholders (themselves included) they would do as Lee Iacocca did and work for a yearly salary of $1 until the company is profitable.

Once you answer why that won't ever happen, you will have answered every question related to "Is Q2P a good investment?".

-Chuck
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent QSAM News