Would you kindly repeat one more time, I haven't been here 2 years. I have never seen any credible narrative for what has happened with specifics of who, how much, etc. What I thought I did understand was that it was believed that LCY, the second half of the JV that bought the assets, was entering into a "second transaction" that was going to be a lot more lucrative for shareholders. The stated evidence for this was the use of the word "affirming", the defined name of the transaction in the documents naming only Visolis, and the notion that the letter was "under seal". Unfortunately LCY's attorney wrote a letter that blew this up.