InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 9231
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/14/2016

Re: iron-eagle post# 99681

Monday, 02/10/2020 7:24:07 AM

Monday, February 10, 2020 7:24:07 AM

Post# of 145254
Unfortunately the court has already addressed the subject . So its highly unlikely they want to hear it again. So most definitely go for it . Maybe the secured creditors can be convinced they were lied to and their lawyers were clueless.

[103] Finally, the Court cannot ignore that the lawyers for the three secured creditors
present at the hearing voiced their agreement that the Monitor's Motion should be granted
in accordance with the conclusions sought in the draft Order. If anyone would have had
an interest to blame PwC for its "alleged misconduct" in these CAA proceedings, it
certainly would have been the secured creditors who were generally speaking kept
appraised of the unfolding events in a timely manner and who are experiencing for the
most part substantial losses as a result of the Visolis Transaction. Yet, not a single creditor
(secured or unsecured) objected to the transaction being approved by the Court and to
the vesting order being issued as a result thereof.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.