Sunday, February 09, 2020 2:22:34 AM
Anyway, that's not the debate. What is denounced in my post is that the U.S. Treasury is considered beneficial owner of a 79.9% stake on FnF all along, that's why a Takings claim arises.
Furthermore, it makes the Warrant illegal, as in the provision that authorizes the Treasury to buy FnF's securities it stresses that it must be taken into consideration the need to maintain their status as private shareholder-owned enterprises, and with this warrant and subsequent determination from the legal point of view that is beneficial owner of a 79.9% Common Stock stake, regardless of the warrant being exercised, is violated.
Thus, the warrant is illegal and it prompts a Takings claim.
Avant Technologies Engages Wired4Tech to Evaluate the Performance of Next Generation AI Server Technology • AVAI • May 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM