InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 23
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/05/2006

Re: wjlknew post# 3847

Thursday, 12/07/2006 10:45:25 AM

Thursday, December 07, 2006 10:45:25 AM

Post# of 6489
The jury probably put the second level of damages in because they most likely had no indication as to the amount of iPlex sold. That would be irrelevant to the discussion of patent infringement. Slacker
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INSM News