Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Wise Man]

Judge Sweeney never said that.Rule of Law Guy is lying.

so Sweeney has given parties until 2/7 to proceed (whether by scheduling order or appeal) and she has simply said in the case before her that is still undecided, which I call Washington Federal (13-cv-00385) challenging the conservatorship itself, that she won’t be rendering an opinion in that case on govts motion to dismiss until she know what the parties are doing in Fairholme.

She said in her Dec 6th Opinion that "the Court infers that Fairholme Plaintiffs have adopted the most important arguments of the other 11 Related Cases......."
So, she named Fairholme the lead case, and it regroups the 12 Related Actions.
Sweeney won't address the other 11 Related Cases individually after Fairholme case. At least, it wasn't their initial plan of burying Washington Federal's Takings claim.