InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 217
Posts 28308
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 02/24/2002

Re: cottonisking post# 86969

Thursday, 01/23/2020 3:18:59 PM

Thursday, January 23, 2020 3:18:59 PM

Post# of 111448

>>"THE COURT: So, what you're referring to is the
22 law that's clear and that I set forth in the recent SRM
23 decision, which I wouldn't charge Mr. Gregory or Mr. Wu with
24 being aware of. But the law is that when there is a general
25 guarantee, as opposed to a specific guarantee, and corporate

resolution is a general guarantee, it's necessary to show
2 that one acted in reliance -- with knowledge of and in
3 reliance on the general guarantee. So, by definition,
4 that's not the case here." <<



"that's not the case here."
What part of that do you not understand?

Joe Stocks