Inventergy Global, Inc. (fka INVT)

[TennisStar]

OFFERS ARE NOT FRAND and Seventh Amendment violations —————> IMO BOLD Mr. Brinkman. Kirkland and Ellis openly criticizing the Federal Circuit? WOW. Then Zhang states “INVT’s offers to Respondents were not FRAND.” INVT being accused of not being fair with the “alleged” infringers of their IP. Isn’t that like a defense attorney blaming the rape victim for wearing clothing? In my opinion it looks and sounds like the respondents and counsel are sinking and sinking fast. They appear to be clinging to anything and everything that’s floating by. Inventergy with a $1billion dollar settlement or wouldn’t that be FRAND? What may have cost your clients $500m 18months might cost them potentially billions. Quite amazing, and in my humble opinion a universally poor defense by the respondents counsel. This is beginning to remind me of Edward Masry's law firm when he filed his direct action suit against PGE and we all know how that turned out for PGE. SETTLE SETTLE SETTLE and admit no wrong doing....or have we long past that point? LOL
Long and strong INVT.

https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/International_Trade_Commission/337-1138/Certain_LTE-_and_3G-Compliant_Cellular_Communications_Devices/docs/699202/1.pdf

https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/International_Trade_Commission/337-1138/Certain_LTE-_and_3G-Compliant_Cellular_Communications_Devices/