Don't get me wrong, I certainly agree the info from the company has been inconsistent and confusing. I'm thinking the inconsistency in info provided initially from Tina may stem from the first attorney from Crone Law that didn't know what they were doing for whatever reason and she was probably just passing along what she received from them. I'm just guessing, as I've not had any contact with her so I don't know when they switched to the new attorney. The attorney now retained, Patrick Loney, apparently understands the matter and has been in contact with Lazar, which Lazar's attorney confirmed. We should be good now as far as that.
As we've stated before, the inconsistency from the LINE account is likely due to a combination of those individuals having lack of overall knowledge of the transaction and also the language barrier. We don't even have specific names for the LINE reps or their sources for the info they provide. At this point, I would really hesitate to rely on info from anyone other than Patrick, Wei-Yu Lee, or Cheng-Che Lee (has anyone tried asking for his email?). I would also say Tina to an extent if she is, in fact, a general attorney for the company, which I'm not sure was ever confirmed, but she's certainly familiar with the transaction.
Details of the transaction, such as which subsidiaries are merging and the structure/relationship of the companies currently is info I would consider borderline proprietary since they are still private. From the description of what the "new" TRDX would be doing, they would be moving pretty much all major companies that we've compiled. We are earlier than we originally thought and we've basically been researching this thing at the same time the govt has been performing its review it seems.
