InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 23
Posts 4876
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/05/2013

Re: Keith27 post# 82525

Thursday, 12/19/2019 8:02:59 AM

Thursday, December 19, 2019 8:02:59 AM

Post# of 104562

12/17/2019 Electronic Docket Entry Temporary injunction hearing; Opening statements; Plaintiff's evidence began; Defense allowed to call witnesses out of order by agreement; Plaintiff's case continues; Case recessed at end of day to resume later this week or Monday 12/23.

12/17/2019 Motion To Quash - Plaintiff's

12/17/2019 Proposed Order Received - Order Granting Motion to Quash



Looking at the logs, one possible reason is the plaintiff agreeing to allow the defendant to call a witness out of order. The plaintiff could have made that decision in error and requested the judge to quash their earlier acceptance of the witness being called.

Another possible reason is that there was some error made by the court in ruling on the subpoena or processing the subpoena.

It doesn't necessarily mean that the court won't allow the defendant to subpoena a witness at a later time.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.