Wednesday, December 18, 2019 10:11:12 AM
Yet still, the other day we "agreed to disagree," because the INTERPRETATION of facts is subjective - nothing wrong with that. However, if one continues an argument on the basis of opinion over and over again after acknowledging that they will never agree with the other point of view, one might call said individual "unreasonable" and therefore discount most if not all of what that individual is saying.
My point: I have demonstrated VERIFIABLE PROOF of one of $AXXA's assets, and have NOT been beligerant or spamming said proof on this board or anywhere else - I believe that those who want to listen, will listen. What does it say about those who masquerade opinions or straw men as if they are facts, yet offer nothing more than then the present share price as their proof?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=152747627
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM