InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 4482
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 12/06/2018

Re: A deleted message

Tuesday, 12/17/2019 1:56:18 PM

Tuesday, December 17, 2019 1:56:18 PM

Post# of 104482
I have limited time to address this but let me start stating what I see. If anyone does not have near photographic memory please reread the shareholder update from last January. Then examine what transpired and you should fully understand why I am irate.

First of all, if a company is being properly run there is no reason not to be both open and honest with shareholders. Nothing of that sort is going on. There were supposed demonstrations of rec2020 in February and April with very interested OEM's. Nothing has been heard since by any of us. The specs were described as industry "disrupting" by Squires himself in a PR. Obviously there was a problem with the dots or a contract would have resulted long ago. Rudimentary intelligence and logic would cause management to identify the problem and then fix it so that revenues can result. The silence explains that is the furthest thing from management's mind. I assume everyone can add 2 and 2 from there.

Regarding India the facts are the Indians defaulted on the contract immediately. Excuses, statements, and promises are irrelevant in the business world. The company has since chosen to go dark. Who do you think funded the reactors? Why go dark?

Regarding this blockchain stuff. It is nothing more than an elaborate torrent. Nothing about it is cutting edge. You do not make a deal with Truitt and Williams doling out tremendous shares and salary without making them prove it is ready to go. There has been no deal in over 4 months. This could have been developed on it's own by an engineer in that time. Why was this deal made prior to the product proving itself beforehand?

There is absolutely no reason for this company to have gone through a year without doing business and go dark. And you wonder why I label Squires as I do? I'm trying to be honest. If QMC had honest management some of that January shareholder update would have come to pass. But decent management would have been necessary.

You can add more choice adjectives to the list unless of course anyone is either deluded or disingenuous enough to think Squires is hot in negotiations with OEM's for his "disrupting" displays.

Is reality hitting or are you happy with Squires?


Shoondale,whenyou assert that Mr. Squires is a (and I quote)a Pimp,Liar and SOB you are in effect stating all those that have any connection with QMC including past and present associates are either complicit or complete idiots.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.