InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 434
Posts 57599
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 01/09/2007

Re: JBIIRULES post# 305519

Tuesday, 12/17/2019 8:07:30 AM

Tuesday, December 17, 2019 8:07:30 AM

Post# of 312016
to put it in even more simple terms

when P2O was finally wrested back from some sabotaging aromatics (Aug 2013)

the most telling sign of an UPSIDE DOWN NR .. was NRs' *handling* of
current CEO's infusion of multiple millions on 9.30.13 .. closing PPS on
9.30.13 was 35c (NRs' last significant illegal manipulation upward
was Jan 2013 when PPS ran from approx mid 70c to 1.49 .. back then
NRs' stress was 1.50 to 1.65) .. as was noted contemporaneously then
any other OTC stock whose CEO had injected $multiple $millions
would have had NR *run* the targeted OTC stock .. instead PTOI went
from 35c on 9.30.13 to 10c on 12.31.13 .. then in case that *effort* eluded
10c was *reset* to 6c in Jan 2014 .. b4 the final *effort* of 2014 .. resetting
6c to 5c to bury the then release of the ACC Executive Summary (Oct 2019)

as has been noted more recently here .. one of the reasons P2O has outlasted
is due to NRs' inability to force P2O into toxic financing .. since P2O was wrested
back .. financing has come from trusted sources .. including the CEO and the BoD


what do all have in common .. they are all successful businessmen in their own right

the irony to all of this is .. intentional or otherwise .. P2O (the company) has outlasted
and sourced buyer/s .. buyer/s who have spent *time* in Euro land where this tech has
been embraced .. more interesting from the US perspective is how a competitor's first
site install is being funded (value of) as has been noted in this very venue since April 2019

anyone really think buyer/s with interest in P2O's tech aren't familiar with either approach

when it comes to PTOI .. NR is already on their knees after that *volume* round last month
and while NR can abusively work PTOI as all actual P2O investors know well .. NRs' efforts
have never had success in parting out *investors* for over a decade (hence the consistent
450~ shareholders since 2013 ~ of which the DTC is *one* shareholder .. snicker)

the only aspect that matters going forward .. is first if the input noted by one buyer bears
fruit .. NF becomes operational again .. and (3) Flagship processes buyer/s feedstock ..
that *fact* will be visible for those with interest to view .. there are at least 4 *locals* who've
indicated a willingness to provide input to this very venue .. second what moves the needle
*imo* for PTOI (stock) is the first buyer/s funds' conveyed to P2O .. that filing forces NR to
face years' worth of *attention and effort* against P2O/PTOI .. and that filing may lead to
yet another 8K that gets early original investors' attention

slow and steady wins this decade old war with a Non Retail entity that has it rigged
and the joy of that for P2O's mgmt and Founder .. is all of it is *known*

4kids

…And yet they continue to fund and file. The Company’s CEO and Directors put 120,000.00 in from October 1 2019 through November 22 2019.

120K is an investment!

120K isn't chump change in my book.

chump change
a small or insignificant amount of money.
"it's rough, dead-end work that pays chump change"
synonyms:
very small sum · pittance · trifle · trifling sum · drop in the ocean · insignificant sum · derisory sum · paltry sum · small change · pennies · next to nothing · hardly anything · peanuts · chicken feed · piddling amount · shoestring · tickey · driblet
https://www.bing.com/search?q=chump+change&pc=MOZI&form=MOZTSB


The Company received $30,000 on October 1, 2019, $15,000 on October 21, 2019, $15,000 on October 29, 2019, $30,000 on November 18, 2019 and $30,000 on November 22, 2019, all in Canadian funds, from the Company’s CEO and Directors in the form of demand secured promissory notes. The advances bear interest at 4%.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1381105/000149315219019294/form10-q.htm




10/5/07 -- there are no coincidences here ...
oh and like many other longs .. not selling at this level --