InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 40
Posts 13238
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/07/2012

Re: None

Thursday, 12/05/2019 8:48:26 AM

Thursday, December 05, 2019 8:48:26 AM

Post# of 59689
......DEFINITELY, a DIG, imo.........whomever writes the opinion will clarify the agency interpretation and the BOB RICHARDS/10 D/C ruling should be upheld in part and clarified in part...........<yawn>...........

.....I fear this monster getting dragged out but the SCOTUS will define some aspect of this case...............short order, although it might get pushed into late Spring, 2020.........THE END......with that much quibbling during the ORALS, imo, the SCOTUS won't send the case back........10th D/C could maintain and re-establish BOB RICHARDS......because BOB RICHARDS was basically an accurately ruled case............economic driver gets the refund, absent a TSA.......all this agency crap is after-birth.........offal .........

.......FDIC COULD PAY US TO ABANDON ON SOME SORT OF PERCEIVED INDECISION BY THE SCOTUS.........but $10mm......????.......sure, but they won't..........

......WE NEED TO FOCUS ON CLOSURE OF THE UWBI BK..........POL and BK CT FINAL ORDER...............................and then the payout by the paying agent..............new horizons....................




Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.