Greenshift Corporation (GERS)

[ice_n_ak]

Did some more thinking today about what I heard on that recording yesterday (again, thanks for providing that)

Anyway, from my perspective it seemed that the questions were mostly regarding the performance of C and C, not so much about the patent or reason for the case in the first place.

I was humored by how accepting the judges were and how short the opposing party spoke.

I've watched government officials in action as once I was one of those officials. Lets take a game warden for example. When they bust a poacher, they are so nice and will listen to whatever excuse, even lead them a bit to stoke their replies, and then drop the hammer.

Some examples of what I found humorous was the question regarding the bar and lawyer. The reply was that is was not recorded but...

Just that one question let the judges know that the representation for GERS was tainted and therefore would throw everything else to include the rulings by the now deceased judge, to be tainted...

There were other examples, but tainted is a word I will use. Therefor, IF I were a judge on the panel, I would go for a trial or retrial or new path for all parties involved.

Only this time, there would be records to present to show the U.S. patent office upheld GERS patents.

But hey, what do I know, I'm just a dreamer.