Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[bcde]

"I will disagree - again"

Any way it does not make much difference whether few agree or disagree.

A normal interpretation of HERA based on all historical and traditional legal interpretations makes it clear that HERA and other laws were violated to impose conservatorship unlawfully and also to rob private shareholder companies.

The current FHFA director MC who helped to write HERA has clearly written that the laws were violated. The previous director Mel Watt told congress that laws were trumped by SPSPA private agreements. What more proof do you want?

The official statements by FHFA clearly state that HERA mandates FHFA to preserve and conserve FnF assets but FHFA pleads to the contrary in courts.

Do yourself a favor - please read recent court filings and rulings to understand the issues involved rather than trying to repeat the misguided and unsupported views.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-563/123839/20191127103429028_USSC%2019-563%20Brief%20for%20Respondents.pdf