InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 810
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/13/2005

Re: PhenixBleu post# 43466

Tuesday, 11/26/2019 9:25:56 AM

Tuesday, November 26, 2019 9:25:56 AM

Post# of 50023
Your interpretation is incorrect. It is exactly what the Judges order says.

The last paragraph of (DE49)

“Plaintiff alleges the three elements of a breach of contract: the existence of a contract, a material breach, and damages resulting from the breach. But the Complaint fails to address the KMPG opinion or any other conditions precedent, and thus it fails to meet even the low pleading standards set by the Federal Rules. Defendants Motion to Dismiss must be granted for Plaintiffs failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”


ORDERED AND ADJUDIED that:

(1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

(2) Plaintiffs Complaint is DISM ISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

(3) Plaintiff is directed to file any Amended Complaint on or before May 31, 2019

The Amended complaint address the KMPG opinion and the remaining conditions of the SPA. Exactly as required.