Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[ano]

Nov 12 2019 Reply of petitioners Patrick J. Collins, et al. filed.

http://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-422/122234/20191113112833296_19-422%20Reply%20Brief.pdf

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........................................ ii
ARGUMENT ................................................................ 1
I. The Court should grant Plaintiffs’ petition. ........ 2
A. If the Court grants Defendants’ petition,
it should also review the Fifth Circuit’s
decision on the remedy for FHFA’s
unconstitutional structure. ........................... 2
B. There is no obstacle to the Court
reaching the important questions
presented in Plaintiffs’ petition. ................... 4
C. The Fifth Circuit’s ruling on the
remedy for FHFA’s unconstitutional
structure is wrong. ........................................ 6
II. At an absolute minimum, the Court
should hold Plaintiffs’ petition for
Seila Law ............................................................ 11
CONCLUSION .......................................................... 12