Asia Broadband Inc (AABB)

[Sobek]

Been reading and want to add my 2 cents...

First off, there is no La Colorada mine owned by the company. They're referring to an area of concessions formally known as Santa Clara, now known as La Coloradas.

Colorada translated means red. Literally thousands of locations referred to as la colorada in Mexico with many not even on the map. And they're referring to a group of concessions, not even a town, and the name of their mining claim itself is most likely something completely different.

As far as locating every concession, it's a challenge. The gov is way behind and currently in the process of reviewing over 20,000 claims just to verify ownership. On top of that, Guerrero has exploded over the last few years with new concessions and start ups moving in putting more pressure on the gov to catch up.

Also, how many people have looked at crime in Guerrero? One of the most violent places in all three of the Americas and it affects mining as well. That said, why would a start up want to advertise where their mine is? To get killed? Maybe have it taken by cartel? It happens, just read the Guerrero news. Google translate works perfectly.

As far as mining in Mexico, you need to form a Mexican based business and be licensed through the gov. Odds are AABB has a sub down there not mentioned in filings. Plenty of pinks do that and when the time is correct, they announce it.

So I can agree with both sides here. Sure we can't prove there is a mine but, we can't debunk there isn't.

There's motive to keep it out of public records. We're dealing with mining in Guerrero where if you go in without a security plan, you very well may end up getting killed.

There's also motive to let shareholders know where it is. But I think the first motive currently outweighs the latter.

So if unless someone can guide me to where I can access all mining licenses in Guerrero and where I can verify the owner's of the business entities' origination of each and every one, I'm left on the fence here.

What we do have to go off of is the balance sheet.

Why if numbers are smoked, hasn't anyone making those allegations opened an active investigation? By the measured rage on this board by those saying the numbers are fake, I'd guess someone has done this already, why not speak up and give us a case number?

I will say this though, I been around and been in a few mining stocks that have soared. And the one thing they all had in common was the naysayers. Those claiming the mines were fake and the numbers smoked. Then when the stock took off they were the firsts to brag about all the shares they had.

I watched the L2 yesterday and for a company with no mines and smoked numbers, someone with some deep pockets sure wants shares bad and a lot of them. Watched them squeezing literally millions of shares out day traders who bought on the news. Stacking the ask and grabbing everything between .005 and .0059 with huge bids in. I watched close to 10 million shares get gobbled up between .005 and .0059 with a good chunk bought above .006

This seems to be the pattern here. Claim the company is fake and buy the blood. Everyone will see, debunk the mines don't exists and the numbers are smoked, and the pps will tank to the trips in a matter of a couple hours if that. But the moment the company releases a key piece of information, it will explode well past a penny.

GLTA. Not here to argue or waste my 3 day weekend, just want to stir the pot a bit.