Friday, November 01, 2019 2:07:31 PM
Well, again, the monitor explained "up front," it's just being ignored because it doesn't fit the fairy tale:
Now, tell me, if the $4.34M was only some sort of "down payment," why did the judge and monitor specifically say it was the total offered and received several times, the latest being the final judge's order for CCAA:
Tell me why the judge would say that if it wasn't true?
Now, tell me, if the $4.34M was only some sort of "down payment," why did the judge and monitor specifically say it was the total offered and received several times, the latest being the final judge's order for CCAA:
Tell me why the judge would say that if it wasn't true?
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
