Buying-Entity’s Lawyers w/acquisition qualifications are-on top-all legal matters
I think a degree of reasonableness and fairness here should prevail.
Its hard for anyone to criticize the play calling of the CLSI merger or anything else when you are in the nosebleed section of the deal.
It’s just opinionated noise, Liz didn’t say Tony was filing. Lawyers are involved here. When the lawyers were reaching out to Liz last Friday re DD, when she called back Tony, he mentioned no need to lawyers said there was no issue. Then Tony called her back that the filing was done Friday.
Liz may call the firm to get a status update on the CLSI merger. It’s not #1 on her to do list. She is not even slightly worried about the deal.
They are dealing with a blizzard in Denver, normally the temp is 65 degrees today its 16 degrees and its presenting some issues for their business to handle.
I mean the CLSI ihub board of posters are not idiots.
Mergers take some time for DD, this merger is happening faster than most. IMO
The new entity who is desiring to go public, for a transaction like this, they have hired Lawyers with acquisition experience backgrounds and accountants are involved here in this merger,
they have performed the necessary DD to protect their client, then evaluate , documenting data for accurate filings and then file the attorney letter with necessary documentation with OTCIQ as they did last Friday.
I would imagine an 8K would also be filed to communicate to their investors of who the new company is that we are invested in..
I don’t think anyone is in a position to be critical of the process from the nosebleed section of this event.
According to Liz and Tony , the CLSI merger is a done deal, now its filed. We are awaiting it to be updated on the OTC markets anyday anytime
I am sure nobody here believes these lawyers dont know how to file an attorney letter?
