Cel Sci Corporation (CVM)

[lightrock]

Fosco thinks the dropouts have to be either very high or we have to be stunningly effective.

I think if we grant some leeway, STARTING with the SEER Data with proper inclusion criteria... Grant up to 5% off of those stats each year 3-5+

And add dropouts fairly high 15%-20%

Note that the entire population that is alive right now is at or beyond 3 years into the study

And what do you get ?

Hi guys, the one thing that keeps bothering me is the question of drop outs. I remember you Light (and others) have raised that point to some extend back in early summer. I wonder if any of you managed to get more insight or facts on that very point in the meantime. CVM management does not seem to be particularly worked up about that issue i appreciate that. Maybe I look at things in too simplistic a way but it seems that either MK works phenomenally well or something else is out of the ordinary I.e SOC much higher than SEER (prob unlikely) or high (much higher than estimated) drop outs. That could have dramatic effects as we know. What do you think Lightrock/rogue/static/others please ? Thanks and GLTA , cheers your Finli