bravo, yes, Emilez, you found the article that I had heard about. Yes, you are correct that the head count is only two; but, the message must have spread to every English teacher in China, right? The company that placed English teachers in that article also said it has shut down from doing so, again, a message that cannot be any clearer, right? I do not think it is a tiny part of what is going on. In perspective, I have to wonder, though, and want to hear anyone else's opinions about this: whether the cooperatives in China that are doing business with SIAF are aware that the entity had a reverse merger into a Nevada (USA) based publicly traded entity? Given the "trade war" between China and the USA, is that a worry? Given the China assertion of control in Hong Kong, and the role of Hong Kong for TRW and other Chinese joint ventures within the SIAF dealings, is that a worry? I still have expectations that the pork crises in China will benefit SIAF. I also have expectations that the weather impacting agriculture will sometimes spectacularly help (not only hurt) SIAF. I also keep resisting buy-in to the zerohedge postings here on this message board.
What is the message about SIAF?
Here is the bone stuck in my throat -- if SIAF know how is as good as it reads, then how did aqua farm 4 turn out such a disaster? Is the model taking more risks than I understand? Is the know how -- poof -- missing?
