InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 810
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/13/2005

Re: None

Tuesday, 10/15/2019 6:30:03 PM

Tuesday, October 15, 2019 6:30:03 PM

Post# of 50023
It’s been stated that there is some false claim regarding the MSJ. So let’s examine what effect that might have on the overall picture here


First claim; MSJ was denied “at this time” without prejudice.
This claim also notes that the actions required to fix the issues with the MSJ were indeed fixed and that the MSJ then survives.
Short version. MSJ continues as though the motion had never been “denied without prejudice” in the first place. No change to the case at all.


Second claim; MSJ was not denied without prejudice.
Same outcome. No changes to the case at all.

This being said. I’m done discussing the MSJ until such time as a new ruling is made on the matter.

Hope this puts this in perspective for everyone. It’s hard to do a so called “P&D” when there is literally no effect to the proceeding either way you read the ruling.