InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 1792
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/07/2006

Re: stockjob post# 196686

Thursday, 11/30/2006 9:58:19 AM

Thursday, November 30, 2006 9:58:19 AM

Post# of 311057
I do not even know where to begin on how to respond to you.
I am not slanted by pumpers or bashers - JUST FACTS. I do think the Voters Trust was a good idea, because it would motivate the company to expose what everyone here wants to know (I do think there is a healthy population of people here who could care less because they are flipping...and in case you didn't read...I held every share during the drop and still hold - but it has become a flippers game at the present unfortunately imo) I very clearly stated, that by serving them with a count of shareholders..it would hopefully, get sljb to respond on it's own without having a legal hand force the company to do so. Again, there are over 35,000,0000 shares in so far...apparently I am not alone in thinking this was a good idea. Secondly...I do hope stock h.o.g keeps up the effort to get a dialogue between sljb and shareholders. As far as personal reasons for wanting the company to be more transparent, well yes I have them because I like everyone else here was expecting clarification.
As for your last statemtent..
report unsubstantiated info to the Windsor Star (and I've read only what you've posted recently) .... I have never said we should report unsubstantiated info to the Windsor Star -wow, that's just a beautiful slanderous statement by you. I have said that it doesn't matter what the WS prints in the big scheme of things (what matters is how transparent the company becomes and of course sljb has the right to defend themselves...I have continually said they should sue for libel)...the Windsor Star is not what ultimately really matter here...correct? Do I hope sljb turns this around...yeah...I think I have said that several times. Do I think they will...I hope so. How do I think they will accomplish that...by being transparent. They could of by now verified some issues that are worisome to many shareholders...
like clarification on Wessal and the Red Sea Group. I am like many, wondering anxiously on why they haven't eased some concerns of shareholders. I think sljb will respond today to the WS. This is all IMO. I am sorry you feel that by wanting the truth, I am a basher.