InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 56
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/15/2006

Re: None

Monday, 10/14/2019 4:49:56 PM

Monday, October 14, 2019 4:49:56 PM

Post# of 105
Hi
I agree that the claim on monies spent during the rebid process is peanuts and the elephant appetite of the lawyers will need more than that to satisfy their costs of effort.
The big ?? will be damages and punitive charge for the
"misuse and disregard for Priority Information and the fact that B destroyed critical info after knowing Pemco was going to challenge the bid results. Do you recall Judge Proctor beginning his allowance for a 'go forward ' by quoting the
J. Mitchell hit..."Don't it always seem to go. That you don't know what you've got. Till it's gone...." He was referring to the destruction of aaii/boeing transcripts (emails tele calls etc.)

He said that knowing AAII would soon be a combatant in the
'rebid' ..that it was a major wrong on Boeing part in "losing this information.

So I think what Tennenbaum and cohorts believe is that the jury will award punitive damages. I thought that was the reason for the original suit asking $$$$$ based on the loss of the KC 135 and resulting company failure to survive.