Monday, October 14, 2019 4:49:56 PM
I agree that the claim on monies spent during the rebid process is peanuts and the elephant appetite of the lawyers will need more than that to satisfy their costs of effort.
The big ?? will be damages and punitive charge for the
"misuse and disregard for Priority Information and the fact that B destroyed critical info after knowing Pemco was going to challenge the bid results. Do you recall Judge Proctor beginning his allowance for a 'go forward ' by quoting the
J. Mitchell hit..."Don't it always seem to go. That you don't know what you've got. Till it's gone...." He was referring to the destruction of aaii/boeing transcripts (emails tele calls etc.)
He said that knowing AAII would soon be a combatant in the
'rebid' ..that it was a major wrong on Boeing part in "losing this information.
So I think what Tennenbaum and cohorts believe is that the jury will award punitive damages. I thought that was the reason for the original suit asking $$$$$ based on the loss of the KC 135 and resulting company failure to survive.
North Bay Resources Commences Operations at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California; Engages Sabean Group Management Consulting • NBRI • Sep 25, 2024 9:15 AM
CEO David B. Dorwart Anticipates a Bright Future at Good Gaming Inc. Through His Most Recent Shareholder Update • GMER • Sep 25, 2024 8:30 AM
Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. Advance Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology - Dr. Bruce Goldberger to Present at Society of Forensic Toxicologists Conference • BLOZF • Sep 24, 2024 8:50 AM
Integrated Ventures, Inc Announces Strategic Partnership For GLP-1 (Semaglutide) Procurement Through MedWell USA, LLC. • INTV • Sep 24, 2024 8:45 AM
Avant Technologies Accelerates Creation of AI-Powered Platform to Revolutionize Patient Care • AVAI • Sep 24, 2024 8:00 AM
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM