Monday, October 14, 2019 4:49:56 PM
I agree that the claim on monies spent during the rebid process is peanuts and the elephant appetite of the lawyers will need more than that to satisfy their costs of effort.
The big ?? will be damages and punitive charge for the
"misuse and disregard for Priority Information and the fact that B destroyed critical info after knowing Pemco was going to challenge the bid results. Do you recall Judge Proctor beginning his allowance for a 'go forward ' by quoting the
J. Mitchell hit..."Don't it always seem to go. That you don't know what you've got. Till it's gone...." He was referring to the destruction of aaii/boeing transcripts (emails tele calls etc.)
He said that knowing AAII would soon be a combatant in the
'rebid' ..that it was a major wrong on Boeing part in "losing this information.
So I think what Tennenbaum and cohorts believe is that the jury will award punitive damages. I thought that was the reason for the original suit asking $$$$$ based on the loss of the KC 135 and resulting company failure to survive.
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM
Moon Equity Holdings, Corp. Announces Acquisition of Wikolo, Inc. • MONI • May 7, 2024 9:48 AM