Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[drumming4life]

You’re conflating 2 different issues using flawed logic.

On one hand, your saying Emil has and will always maintain majority control of VPLM, through the anti-dilution clause, which is true...unless he sells the company.
If a change in control agreement were to be executed, this becomes a material event triggering a SEC reporting requirement.

On the other hand, you profess shareholders should be “privy” to inside information, which is false. The offer, which was most likely covered by a non-disclosure agreement, may or may not ever be executed. Making shareholders “privy” to company info is done through press releases...which many here claim are just to pump up the shares price. Imagine the screaming if VPLM did put out a PR on the deal and the price jumped then tanked when the declination decision was made!

SEC reporting and company press releases are not the same thing. One is a statutory requirement to remain compliant with the law and the other is public relations/marketing! Two totally different things.

But hey, no big deal, Apple doesn’t announce or disclose actual acquisitions either and they’re a multi-billion & allegedly “fully transparent” company!